Message-ID: <20208147.1075853220799.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com
Subject: Request to FERC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: Steven J Kean
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 09:44 AM -----

	"Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>
	05/22/2001 09:46 AM
		 
		 To: <gfergus@brobeck.com>, <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>
		 cc: <linda.robertson@enron.com>, <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 Subject: Request to FERC


I have had several more conversations that convince me that FERC will provide 
very helpful answers to the three quesitions that Robin sent to me regarding 
FERC's jurisdiction over the issues in the California cases.

You should be aware of timing issues.  Two of FERC's five positions (both 
Republican or Independent) are vacant, but soon to be filled by nominated 
candidates.  Both nominees (Pat Wood and Nora Brownell) are expected to be 
helpful to our interests.   If we suceed in getting a U.S. district court 
judge to sollicit FERC's view befor the  two new nominees are seated, there 
may be a slight risk that members of Congress will hold their nominations 
hostage over the issue of how FERC answers the court.

I have copied Linda Robertson, the head of Enron's Washington shop, so that 
she can assess how real this risk is and whether it should influence our 
timing.
